Hello everyone, without using my FreeTime time here, I decided to bring more poster about religion, because that was one of the previous entries did.
At this point, I want to talk about what conditions it might be a person when he gets stuck in dogmas, when petrify their thoughts through time, as reactionary defend their selfish interests and subjective. I mean that "pose" of intellectual on the net, really cool ones and intellectuals to deny the existence of God, warning that bother me to have my writing here, but even I, a user will like to respect the communities, I feel very uncomfortable with that kind of users who have emerged as "intellectuals", when in reality, it is likely that such people love to brag on the Internet so they are not, as you said Zorc in his latest video.
deny Do you think God makes you smarter? Are atheists are pro-science, and everything that is not in science is useless to us? What is the difference between religious dogma and skeptical dogma?
Unfortunately, some people have made the public media to highlight their pseudo-wisdom, his pseudo-knowledge at all and thus apply it to others beliefs are an instinctive nature of psychology, are thoughts that become pleasing to the minds, they become palpable to our thinking, and can become a peaceful and harmonious faith, but when it comes to extremes of jealousy, in combination of ego, and a completely erroneous moral causes what we call dogma. Dogma is what we do to indoctrinate others through improper pronunciations and lacking any critical analysis. Belongs to the center of instinct and our reaction to seeing our animalistic nature, which may be to defend your child against a murderer, or protect your friends no matter what happens to us, or you can be as stifling our inner sadism usually go to quench their thirst for blood.
people because of their beliefs, have increased greatly to the culture, and that human values \u200b\u200bare due in large part to the belief, and that the analysis they have been improved or transformed for the common good : respect, ethics, morality, love, affection, etc.. Although this is relatively true, the contrast, the dogma has been the driver of ideological indoctrination fully conditional seek only followers and sheep, which are only going to spread hatred against other faiths. All to maintain hegemony credential. And for the dogma is necessary to implement " the end justifies the means " why do not hesitate to kill anyone who was a danger, as we see, not only impose dogmas Petrifying beliefs but also by fear makes a search for security, killing anyone who stands out as detrimental to the dogmatic. Fully
reactionary and they exist in many forms, in religious because religious jealousy have created the dogmatic religion, and politics, so that those people who highlight their ideology and are completely reactionary and conditional, the imposed by the violence. Communism for example, killed a lot of people, totally sucked Russia with many executions, purges, genocides, all for a failed idea that does not lead to anything. The judge conditionally ruthless capitalism and away to the poor, leaving them to their suffering, wars are not simply the result of business, is a question of markets, as you become richer at the expense of others and killing them and not caring a shit about the value of the life of another being. The Nazis condemned both the Jews and the German people themselves, just as a matter of the market. All because of the subjective beliefs and dogmatic of them, and wanting everything to be prevailing on selfish interests. Hate can not be solved with more hate. Under the conditional interest can only expect the worst. There is nothing worse than subjective interests.
Now in this paragraph will highlight the conditioning that atheists give their explanation of cheap philosophy of existentialism and nihilism, the "super scientists" of modern materialism. They believe that not believing in God, makes you more smarter, bolder, more intellectual. Unfortunately, belief in a non-belief can also develop into dogma, and not unlike the others, because they go the same way, defending self-interests. Modern skepticism, which highlights the question as "source of knowledge" I ask myself this question: How can certainly get knowledge? With no sources, no bases, no empirical data, how to achieve knowledge, if nothing else there is a question?
Duda Dupes of God, because it placed as an engine of knowledge, and yet the question itself is not bad. The question is when there are no unclear or unlikely sources, you need to look in depth and usually take the form of questions, in the form of questions. However, skeptics believe in themselves, convinced of their ignorance, doubt or question, and makes you whole eminence in any intellectual idol. They laugh at all those who have religious beliefs towards God, towards spiritual beings, to those who say something quite extraordinary, pride should not be confused with the intellect.
stop believing in God makes you special, because you're being conditioned on your own selfish interests under your mental shackles and psychological prison. Stop being an atheist to become a believer changes nothing, you're still the same old thing. Stop being an agnostic or become a philosophy to another no difference. Why do you say this? Because those are totally superficial changes are just facials, and have nothing to do with the real Psychological Revolution. The poses and appearances can be deceiving, but ignorance, sooner or later, do not hesitate to give back. Be a poseur does not give you much less self-esteem and lifts you spiritually, simply increases the ego and makes you whole complexes.
And we must do so to avoid falling into dogma?
Unfortunately I can not tell to do not to fall into the despicable dogmas, but I can say that everyone can avoid questioning oneself of his life, using the knife of self-criticism, meditate and reflect on itself. There is no point questioning from person to person his faults, if we have the same troubles, or worse.
We respect others, so that others respect us, respect is mutual.
0 comments:
Post a Comment