Hello users and users of Blogger. This time I want to comment on the Copyright and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) policy and the result has YouTube left.
What is Copyright?
The Copyright
(in English) is a set of rules and principles governing moral and economic rights that the law
granted to authors (copyrights
), solely made the creation of a literary, artistic, scientific or didactic, it is published or unpublished.
Copyright is a time element to register a work, which are meant to protect from unauthorized distribution by the author or by those responsible for the work, which can slow the progression unlawful distribution or use terms imposed by the owners. It is useful in cases of plagiarism and claim for breach of such money does not generate profit and the author himself.
YouTube Policy
YT policies prohibit uploading copyrighted material is a fundamental rule that imposes the same managers and directors of YT to do no harm to the site with charge compensation cases " authors of a work "particular. It is so upsetting, that increases videos on YouTube, there is a yellow placard that says do not climb television programs, and not violate the restriction of rights Copyright. Despite this, the law is not fulfilled by the users, and often skip this standard.
In response to that, YouTube's program on "Content ID" to track allowing copyrighted videos, when a video is found, the owner has three options:
-
Track : allows the owner to watch replicas, where they reproduce and the comments and ratings too.
-
Block: When a video is detected, and has this rule, the video can not be viewed on YouTube, and automatically, the user acquires an infringement.
-
Monetize : the owner allows the user to use the video, but with banner advertising, and each containing video playback, will have a value per click.
warnings count as the "strike" in baseball, if you have at least three strikes, your account is suspended. It should be noted that this warning is dissolved within 6 months, after 6 months, the account is cleared of "strikes."
YouTube Inconsistencies in Copyright
Since being bought by Google Inc. to come giving changes and those changes are not good from the point of view of users of the great video page. But the world view of the Directors report that is to prop up the page, and avoid conflict with record labels and producers. So much so, that the major labels have negotiated or attempted to negotiate with Google to avoid compensation. WMG labels like Sony Music, UMG, EMI and others.
However, many videos have been banned and suspended many contacts, many of my subscribers and friends have lost their accounts because of this legislation. Should underscore what happened in February 2007 when Viacom sued YouTube over 1000 videos and demanding a fine of 1,000 million U.S. Dollars (USD), which the company Google led him to the decision not to allow breaches copyright. For his part, advised users to boycott the hearing VIACOM, for the event to YouTube. Currently, the site suffers from financial decline, which may further aggravate the situation and that the rules are more obtuse.
In summary
The copyright on YouTube has been the consequences Negative points for the users and the company that manages and operates. I know that on one hand, the authors believe that this bad videos you delete a video or the account is suspended, but on the other hand we have the company which, through these actions we take, content companies often complain about the video or audio track. Even if we look at other pages of videos its rules are not as severe. What happens is that YouTube is Google, and Google is in a financial partnership of U.S. capitalism, they worry about the economic and financial position of the corporation. In my opinion, I fully understand the situation of the page, but They must understand that their growth and greatness it owes to each user who raises its content. I think there should be other alternatives to copyright, as
Creative Commons or GNU or GPL licensing so that it can be more confidence among users of the community and management. Intellectual works not only to market.
0 comments:
Post a Comment